This is the new MLex platform. Existing customers should continue to use the existing MLex platform until migrated.
For any queries, please contact Customer Services or your Account Manager.
Dismiss

Professors back strong remedies against Google in US DOJ, states' antitrust case

( August 5, 2026, 03:49 GMT | Official Statement) -- MLex Summary: Antitrust law, economics, and business professors called on a US appeals court to affirm that the Sherman Act “applies with equal force to digital, zero-price markets as it does to offline, brick-and-mortar industries.” They filed a brief in support of the US Court of Appeals for the DC Circuit affirming a judgment against Google in a monopoly case brought by the Department of Justice and a group of states, and argued for stronger remedies. The professors said that the case offers a chance to correct the lower court’s deviation from longstanding antitrust principles, which would otherwise leave “Google largely free to continue paying distributors billions of dollars for favored placement over rivals.”See attached file. ...

Prepare for tomorrow’s regulatory change, today

MLex identifies risk to business wherever it emerges, with specialist reporters across the globe providing exclusive news and deep-dive analysis on the proposals, probes, enforcement actions and rulings that matter to your organization and clients, now and in the longer term.


Know what others in the room don’t, with features including:

  • Daily newsletters for Antitrust, M&A, Trade, Data Privacy & Security, Technology, AI and more
  • Custom alerts on specific filters including geographies, industries, topics and companies to suit your practice needs
  • Predictive analysis from expert journalists across North America, the UK and Europe, Latin America and Asia-Pacific
  • Curated case files bringing together news, analysis and source documents in a single timeline

Experience MLex today with a 14-day free trial.

Start Free Trial

Already a subscriber? Click here to login