This is the new MLex platform. Existing customers should continue to use the existing MLex platform until migrated.
For any queries, please contact Customer Services or your Account Manager. Dismiss

Plaintiffs push for US high court review of sex-trafficking case against X Corp.

( April 16, 2026, 21:24 GMT | Official Statement) -- MLex Summary: Plaintiffs bringing privacy and sex-trafficking claims against X Corp. filed a reply in support of their petition for the US Supreme Court to review their case. The brief says, “This petition is the straightforward vehicle to address the outermost limit of §230 immunity. This case is not about what steps some internet company should take to monitor content that it is unwittingly hosting. It is about the company’s own knowing and deliberate acts. Do federal laws prohibit Twitter from knowingly possessing, distributing, and profiting from child pornography—like everyone else? Or does §230 put Twitter above the law?” See attached file. ...

Prepare for tomorrow’s regulatory change, today

MLex identifies risk to business wherever it emerges, with specialist reporters across the globe providing exclusive news and deep-dive analysis on the proposals, probes, enforcement actions and rulings that matter to your organization and clients, now and in the longer term.


Know what others in the room don’t, with features including:

  • Daily newsletters for Antitrust, M&A, Trade, Data Privacy & Security, Technology, AI and more
  • Custom alerts on specific filters including geographies, industries, topics and companies to suit your practice needs
  • Predictive analysis from expert journalists across North America, the UK and Europe, Latin America and Asia-Pacific
  • Curated case files bringing together news, analysis and source documents in a single timeline

Experience MLex today with a 14-day free trial.

Start Free Trial

Already a subscriber? Click here to login