This is the new MLex platform. Existing customers should continue to use the existing MLex platform until migrated.
For any queries, please contact Customer Services or your Account Manager. Dismiss

Meta shouldn’t get judgment for disliking verdict, plaintiffs say in US privacy case

( August 21, 2025, 22:31 GMT | Official Statement) -- MLex Summary: Plaintiffs opposed Meta Platforms’ motions for decertification and judgment in a US wiretap case involving Flo Health, saying the evidence presented over six trial days was more than sufficient for the jury to find that Meta violated the California Invasion of Privacy Act. “Unable to meet Rule 50’s high burden, Meta argues that undefined terms in § 632 — like ‘record,’ ‘eavesdrop,’ or ‘recording device’— must be interpreted using self-serving definitions it strategically crafted post-trial to exclude its misconduct from the statute. This is not the law. Regardless, even under Meta’s own terms, the evidence easily permitted the jury to find for plaintiffs,” they said.See attached file. ...

Prepare for tomorrow’s regulatory change, today

MLex identifies risk to business wherever it emerges, with specialist reporters across the globe providing exclusive news and deep-dive analysis on the proposals, probes, enforcement actions and rulings that matter to your organization and clients, now and in the longer term.


Know what others in the room don’t, with features including:

  • Daily newsletters for Antitrust, M&A, Trade, Data Privacy & Security, Technology, AI and more
  • Custom alerts on specific filters including geographies, industries, topics and companies to suit your practice needs
  • Predictive analysis from expert journalists across North America, the UK and Europe, Latin America and Asia-Pacific
  • Curated case files bringing together news, analysis and source documents in a single timeline

Experience MLex today with a 14-day free trial.

Start Free Trial

Already a subscriber? Click here to login

Documents

Related Sections