Epic Games tells US Supreme Court Apple was correctly held in contempt
( November 13, 2026, 21:58 GMT | Official Statement) -- MLex Summary: Epic Games told the US Supreme Court that Apple acted in bad faith both in scheming to evade an injunction and in attempting to cover up that scheme as found by a California district court and affirmed by a court of appeals. The judgment of the court of appeals should be affirmed and Apple’s knowledge and bad faith confirm that no fair ground of doubt exists here, Epic Games said. It presented the high court with the question, "Whether a party may be held in contempt only when the injunction’s text prohibits the precise conduct challenged, or also when a reasonable person reading the injunction’s terms in light of its context and purposes would understand that conduct to be prohibited, including when the party seeks to circumvent the injunction through alternative means."X post follows. See attached document....
Prepare for tomorrow’s regulatory change, today
MLex identifies risk to business wherever it emerges, with specialist reporters across the globe providing exclusive news and deep-dive analysis on the proposals, probes, enforcement actions and rulings that matter to your organization and clients, now and in the longer term.
Know what others in the room don’t, with features including:
- Daily newsletters for Antitrust, M&A, Trade, Data Privacy & Security, Technology, AI and more
- Custom alerts on specific filters including geographies, industries, topics and companies to suit your practice needs
- Predictive analysis from expert journalists across North America, the UK and Europe, Latin America and Asia-Pacific
- Curated case files bringing together news, analysis and source documents in a single timeline
Experience MLex today with a 14-day free trial.