( September 4, 2026, 14:18 GMT | Official Statement) -- MLex Summary: Pacific Gas and Electric and its president, Carla Peterman, as well as Southern California Edison and San Diego Gas & Electric filed replies supporting dismissal of US energy price-fixing claims brought by a PG&E consumer, saying the plaintiff's opposition to dismissal "resurrects arguments this Court rejected in its prior dismissal ruling." At bottom, the complaint is about the California Public Utilities Commission's decision regarding the operative net energy metering tariff, which cannot support any claim against the utility defendants or overcome their First Amendment protections for their petitioning activity to the CPUC, the defendants said in their filing in the Northern District of California. "This case should not go any further," the utilities said.See attached document: ...
Prepare for tomorrow’s regulatory change, today
MLex identifies risk to business wherever it emerges, with specialist reporters across the globe providing exclusive news and deep-dive analysis on the proposals, probes, enforcement actions and rulings that matter to your organization and clients, now and in the longer term.
Know what others in the room don’t, with features including:
- Daily newsletters for Antitrust, M&A, Trade, Data Privacy & Security, Technology, AI and more
- Custom alerts on specific filters including geographies, industries, topics and companies to suit your practice needs
- Predictive analysis from expert journalists across North America, the UK and Europe, Latin America and Asia-Pacific
- Curated case files bringing together news, analysis and source documents in a single timeline
Experience MLex today with a 14-day free trial.