This is the new MLex platform. Existing customers should continue to use the existing MLex platform until migrated.
For any queries, please contact Customer Services or your Account Manager. Dismiss

AAM look to affirm judgment against California pay-for-delay law

( August 22, 2025, 23:31 GMT | Official Statement) -- MLex Summary: Association for Accessible Medications asked a US appeals court to affirm an order against California’s pay-for-delay law. “AB824 is preempted—and not just with respect to out-of-state agreements. AB824 conflicts with multiple provisions of the Patent Act that protect the rights of patent holders: It treats as inherently suspect the exercise of patent holders’ federal law right to grant exclusive licenses and forbids courts to presume that a patent is valid, which federal law requires courts to presume,” it said.See attached file....

Prepare for tomorrow’s regulatory change, today

MLex identifies risk to business wherever it emerges, with specialist reporters across the globe providing exclusive news and deep-dive analysis on the proposals, probes, enforcement actions and rulings that matter to your organization and clients, now and in the longer term.


Know what others in the room don’t, with features including:

  • Daily newsletters for Antitrust, M&A, Trade, Data Privacy & Security, Technology, AI and more
  • Custom alerts on specific filters including geographies, industries, topics and companies to suit your practice needs
  • Predictive analysis from expert journalists across North America, the UK and Europe, Latin America and Asia-Pacific
  • Curated case files bringing together news, analysis and source documents in a single timeline

Experience MLex today with a 14-day free trial.

Start Free Trial

Already a subscriber? Click here to login

Documents

Related Sections