ZTE battles Samsung to have patent case decided in China
By Douglas Clarke-Williams ( October 28, 2025, 12:50 GMT | Insight) -- ZTE argued Tuesday that its efforts to have a decision on fair, reasonable and non-discriminatory, or FRAND, rates for standard essential patents, or SEPs, decided by a Chinese court did not amount to bad faith. The Chinese company also argued that a UK court's decision in the dispute shouldn't take precedence over a Chinese court's ruling simply because the UK court heard the case first.Shenzhen-based electronics manufacturer ZTE on Tuesday appealed a June decision by a UK court (see here) which said that ZTE would be considered an unwilling licensor if it did not grant Samsung an interim license and found that ZTE had acted in bad faith by attempting to have the issue decided by a Chinese court....
Prepare for tomorrow’s regulatory change, today
MLex identifies risk to business wherever it emerges, with specialist reporters across the globe providing exclusive news and deep-dive analysis on the proposals, probes, enforcement actions and rulings that matter to your organization and clients, now and in the longer term.
Know what others in the room don’t, with features including:
- Daily newsletters for Antitrust, M&A, Trade, Data Privacy & Security, Technology, AI and more
- Custom alerts on specific filters including geographies, industries, topics and companies to suit your practice needs
- Predictive analysis from expert journalists across North America, the UK and Europe, Latin America and Asia-Pacific
- Curated case files bringing together news, analysis and source documents in a single timeline
Experience MLex today with a 14-day free trial.