23XI, Front Row oppose NASCAR judgment motion in US monopolization case
( October 15, 2025, 15:17 GMT | Official Statement) -- MLex Summary: Racing teams 23XI and Front Row Motorsports opposed the National Association for Stock Car Auto Racing's motion for summary judgment on their antitrust claims, saying the motion "appears to be written exclusively for the press, as counsel for NASCAR surely knows that the arguments they are presenting are not a basis for granting summary judgment." NASCAR wrongly claims the plaintiffs are seeking to have the charter system declared an antitrust violation, which they do not; NASCAR's "repackaged" statute-of-limitations arguments fail again; NASCAR mischaracterizes the standard for injury inflicted by its monopoly; and lastly, the defendant's standing arguments that "only competitors having standing to bring a Section 2 claim" must be rejected again, the racing teams said in their opposition to summary judgment filed in the US Western District of North Carolina.See attached document. ...
Prepare for tomorrow’s regulatory change, today
MLex identifies risk to business wherever it emerges, with specialist reporters across the globe providing exclusive news and deep-dive analysis on the proposals, probes, enforcement actions and rulings that matter to your organization and clients, now and in the longer term.
Know what others in the room don’t, with features including:
- Daily newsletters for Antitrust, M&A, Trade, Data Privacy & Security, Technology, AI and more
- Custom alerts on specific filters including geographies, industries, topics and companies to suit your practice needs
- Predictive analysis from expert journalists across North America, the UK and Europe, Latin America and Asia-Pacific
- Curated case files bringing together news, analysis and source documents in a single timeline
Experience MLex today with a 14-day free trial.