Plaintiffs tell US appeals court they didn’t agree to Tile’s arbitration clause
( September 10, 2025, 22:31 GMT | Official Statement) -- MLex Summary: Plaintiffs accusing Tile of violating privacy guarantees in the California constitution and other laws by physical tracking devices told a US appeals court that they didn’t manifest assent to Tile’s October 2023 terms of service. They opposed the court enforcing an arbitration agreement, saying that they assented to Tile’s January 2021 and February 2023 terms, but they did not see — much less assent to — an October 2023 mass email that referenced the October 2023 terms.See attached file. ...
Prepare for tomorrow’s regulatory change, today
MLex identifies risk to business wherever it emerges, with specialist reporters across the globe providing exclusive news and deep-dive analysis on the proposals, probes, enforcement actions and rulings that matter to your organization and clients, now and in the longer term.
Know what others in the room don’t, with features including:
- Daily newsletters for Antitrust, M&A, Trade, Data Privacy & Security, Technology, AI and more
- Custom alerts on specific filters including geographies, industries, topics and companies to suit your practice needs
- Predictive analysis from expert journalists across North America, the UK and Europe, Latin America and Asia-Pacific
- Curated case files bringing together news, analysis and source documents in a single timeline
Experience MLex today with a 14-day free trial.