The uncomfortable legal precedent behind Australia's BlueScope antitrust ruling
By Saloni Sinha and James Panichi ( September 1, 2025, 08:13 GMT | Comment) -- Last week’s BlueScope Steel antitrust ruling appeared to settle the question of what types of behavior can be considered an attempt to lure a competitor into an anticompetitive agreement. Yet a closer look at how the judges dealt with a complex legal precedent, in which Australia’s top court concluded that a cartel needed to be an agreement between two parties, suggests this key issue may still not be resolved.On paper, last week’s ruling by an Australian court’s appeals panel dealing with two similar antitrust cases should have been conceptually simple....
Prepare for tomorrow’s regulatory change, today
MLex identifies risk to business wherever it emerges, with specialist reporters across the globe providing exclusive news and deep-dive analysis on the proposals, probes, enforcement actions and rulings that matter to your organization and clients, now and in the longer term.
Know what others in the room don’t, with features including:
- Daily newsletters for Antitrust, M&A, Trade, Data Privacy & Security, Technology, AI and more
- Custom alerts on specific filters including geographies, industries, topics and companies to suit your practice needs
- Predictive analysis from expert journalists across North America, the UK and Europe, Latin America and Asia-Pacific
- Curated case files bringing together news, analysis and source documents in a single timeline
Experience MLex today with a 14-day free trial.