Teradata opposes US Supreme Court review of antitrust case against SAP
( August 25, 2025, 17:05 GMT | Official Statement) -- MLex Summary: SAP’s petition for US Supreme Court review of an antitrust case brought by Teradata seeks advisory answers to theoretical questions that are either not implicated by the case or that may not matter to its ultimate outcome once it proceeds, Teradata said in a brief opposing review. “Teradata’s tying claim is proceeding to trial regardless of the applicability of this court’s modified per se rule, because the Ninth Circuit found a triable factual dispute existed under the rule of reason as well—a disposition that SAP’s petition never challenges and hardly even acknowledges. If Teradata prevails under the rule of reason, there will be no need for this court to consider either question SAP presents,” it argued.See attached file. ...
Prepare for tomorrow’s regulatory change, today
MLex identifies risk to business wherever it emerges, with specialist reporters across the globe providing exclusive news and deep-dive analysis on the proposals, probes, enforcement actions and rulings that matter to your organization and clients, now and in the longer term.
Know what others in the room don’t, with features including:
- Daily newsletters for Antitrust, M&A, Trade, Data Privacy & Security, Technology, AI and more
- Custom alerts on specific filters including geographies, industries, topics and companies to suit your practice needs
- Predictive analysis from expert journalists across North America, the UK and Europe, Latin America and Asia-Pacific
- Curated case files bringing together news, analysis and source documents in a single timeline
Experience MLex today with a 14-day free trial.