( August 20, 2025, 22:31 GMT | Official Statement) -- MLex Summary: Epic Games opposed Google’s claim that a new case against it over an alleged deal with Samsung is precluded by a previous one brought by Epic, saying the new complaint challenges subsequent conduct that continues after the first case and that now harms Epic both as a developer and as an owner of the Epic Games Store, which had not yet launched on Android when the jury reached its verdict. “Nothing about Google I immunizes this later-occurring conduct. And contrary to Google’s claims, Epic does not ‘resurrect’ litigated claims, but rather brings new claims targeting new, ongoing harm. Epic targets false statements Google makes now about its apps, its store and the apps it distributes through that store,” Epic argued. See attached file. ...
Prepare for tomorrow’s regulatory change, today
MLex identifies risk to business wherever it emerges, with specialist reporters across the globe providing exclusive news and deep-dive analysis on the proposals, probes, enforcement actions and rulings that matter to your organization and clients, now and in the longer term.
Know what others in the room don’t, with features including:
- Daily newsletters for Antitrust, M&A, Trade, Data Privacy & Security, Technology, AI and more
- Custom alerts on specific filters including geographies, industries, topics and companies to suit your practice needs
- Predictive analysis from expert journalists across North America, the UK and Europe, Latin America and Asia-Pacific
- Curated case files bringing together news, analysis and source documents in a single timeline
Experience MLex today with a 14-day free trial.