This is the new MLex platform. Existing customers should continue to use the existing MLex platform until migrated.
For any queries, please contact Customer Services or your Account Manager. Dismiss

AI companies’ risk-management regimes are largely inadequate, reports find

( July 17, 2025, 14:26 GMT | Official Statement) -- MLex Summary: The world’s leading AI developers are generally improving their risk-management practices, but all still have wholly inadequate frameworks, according to reports by two monitoring bodies. SaferAI scored developers against texts such as the EU AI Code of Practice and the G7 Hiroshima Process, and gave Anthropic the highest marks: just 35 percent. Meta's score has improved to 22 percent, from 14 percent last year. The Future of Life Institute found that no developer was prepared for its own stated goals, with none scoring above a D in existential planning. Overall it ranked Anthropic top with a C+ grade, and OpenAI second.Please see the SaferAI statement and Future of Life Institute report attached....

Prepare for tomorrow’s regulatory change, today

MLex identifies risk to business wherever it emerges, with specialist reporters across the globe providing exclusive news and deep-dive analysis on the proposals, probes, enforcement actions and rulings that matter to your organization and clients, now and in the longer term.


Know what others in the room don’t, with features including:

  • Daily newsletters for Antitrust, M&A, Trade, Data Privacy & Security, Technology, AI and more
  • Custom alerts on specific filters including geographies, industries, topics and companies to suit your practice needs
  • Predictive analysis from expert journalists across North America, the UK and Europe, Latin America and Asia-Pacific
  • Curated case files bringing together news, analysis and source documents in a single timeline

Experience MLex today with a 14-day free trial.

Start Free Trial

Already a subscriber? Click here to login

Documents

Related Sections