This is the new MLex platform. Existing customers should continue to use the existing MLex platform until migrated.
For any queries, please contact Customer Services or your Account Manager. Dismiss

Google decision improperly ignored Ninth Circuit mandate, plaintiffs tell court

( June 24, 2025, 21:20 GMT | Official Statement) -- MLex Summary: Plaintiffs suing Google over whether it allowed Chrome users to give meaningful consent for the collection of their data when they weren't logged into a Google account have petitioned a US appeals court to consider whether the federal judge who handed a key litigation victory to Google this month improperly ignored an earlier appeal court's ruling in the case. Saying the ruling by US District Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers was "in direct conflict" with the previous decision by the US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, the plaintiffs asked the  appeals court ruling to assign the same three judges to the case.See attached document....

Prepare for tomorrow’s regulatory change, today

MLex identifies risk to business wherever it emerges, with specialist reporters across the globe providing exclusive news and deep-dive analysis on the proposals, probes, enforcement actions and rulings that matter to your organization and clients, now and in the longer term.


Know what others in the room don’t, with features including:

  • Daily newsletters for Antitrust, M&A, Trade, Data Privacy & Security, Technology, AI and more
  • Custom alerts on specific filters including geographies, industries, topics and companies to suit your practice needs
  • Predictive analysis from expert journalists across North America, the UK and Europe, Latin America and Asia-Pacific
  • Curated case files bringing together news, analysis and source documents in a single timeline

Experience MLex today with a 14-day free trial.

Start Free Trial

Already a subscriber? Click here to login

Documents

Related Sections