( March 25, 2025, 16:10 GMT | Official Statement) -- MLex summary: Amazon improperly designated operational, business and strategic documents as attorney-client communications or attorney-work product, according to a Washington federal judge overseeing class-action antitrust litigation. “For many of these communications, in-house attorneys are simply copied on emails,” US District Judge John Chun said in an order filed in the Western District of Washington requiring Amazon to hand over to the plaintiffs 54 out of 85 documents reviewed in camera. “Even where an in-house attorney actively takes part in a conversation, most of the communications involve public relations matters, technical/operational issues, strategic goals for the company, customer expectations, or regulatory demands, not requests for or the provision of legal advice.”See attached document....
Prepare for tomorrow’s regulatory change, today
MLex identifies risk to business wherever it emerges, with specialist reporters across the globe providing exclusive news and deep-dive analysis on the proposals, probes, enforcement actions and rulings that matter to your organization and clients, now and in the longer term.
Know what others in the room don’t, with features including:
- Daily newsletters for Antitrust, M&A, Trade, Data Privacy & Security, Technology, AI and more
- Custom alerts on specific filters including geographies, industries, topics and companies to suit your practice needs
- Predictive analysis from expert journalists across North America, the UK and Europe, Latin America and Asia-Pacific
- Curated case files bringing together news, analysis and source documents in a single timeline
Experience MLex today with a 14-day free trial.