This is the new MLex platform. Existing customers should continue to use the existing MLex platform until migrated.
For any queries, please contact Customer Services or your Account Manager. Dismiss

Appeals court gets ex-enforcers' advice on antitrust remedy in Epic-Google case

( December 3, 2024, 18:37 GMT | Official Statement) -- MLex Summary: Former US federal antitrust enforcers cautioned an appeals court against imposing a forced-sharing or price-regulation remedy in Epic Games’ antitrust case against Google. Epic won an injunction against Google that required changes to its Play Store. The former officials said that among other things, forced-sharing remedies require a district court to regulate the prices, terms and other conditions of services to be provided, possibly for an extended period of time, during which costs, demand, available technology, and other relevant economic considerations may shift substantially. They said antitrust remedies must have a clear “causal connection” to the underlying anticompetitive harm.See attached file. ...

Prepare for tomorrow’s regulatory change, today

MLex identifies risk to business wherever it emerges, with specialist reporters across the globe providing exclusive news and deep-dive analysis on the proposals, probes, enforcement actions and rulings that matter to your organization and clients, now and in the longer term.


Know what others in the room don’t, with features including:

  • Daily newsletters for Antitrust, M&A, Trade, Data Privacy & Security, Technology, AI and more
  • Custom alerts on specific filters including geographies, industries, topics and companies to suit your practice needs
  • Predictive analysis from expert journalists across North America, the UK and Europe, Latin America and Asia-Pacific
  • Curated case files bringing together news, analysis and source documents in a single timeline

Experience MLex today with a 14-day free trial.

Start Free Trial

Already a subscriber? Click here to login

Documents

Related Sections