This is the new MLex platform. Existing customers should continue to use the existing MLex platform until migrated.
For any queries, please contact Customer Services or your Account Manager. Dismiss

Summary judgment in favor of Wireless Alliance should be granted, in part, US magistrate judge recommends

( October 21, 2024, 10:10 GMT | Official Statement) -- MLex Summary: One Wireless Alliance patent asserted against AT&T and Verizon is not encumbered by a fair, reasonable and nondiscriminatory, or Frand, license term, but the defendants should be given the opportunity to prove essentiality of two others at trial, a US magistrate judge ruled. In the case, AT&T and Verizon argue that because Wireless Alliance held the latter two patents out as standard essential during failed negotiations, they are Frand-encumbered.See document below....

Prepare for tomorrow’s regulatory change, today

MLex identifies risk to business wherever it emerges, with specialist reporters across the globe providing exclusive news and deep-dive analysis on the proposals, probes, enforcement actions and rulings that matter to your organization and clients, now and in the longer term.


Know what others in the room don’t, with features including:

  • Daily newsletters for Antitrust, M&A, Trade, Data Privacy & Security, Technology, AI and more
  • Custom alerts on specific filters including geographies, industries, topics and companies to suit your practice needs
  • Predictive analysis from expert journalists across North America, the UK and Europe, Latin America and Asia-Pacific
  • Curated case files bringing together news, analysis and source documents in a single timeline

Experience MLex today with a 14-day free trial.

Start Free Trial

Already a subscriber? Click here to login

Documents

Related Sections