This is the new MLex platform. Existing customers should continue to use the existing MLex platform until migrated.
For any queries, please contact Customer Services or your Account Manager. Dismiss

SharkNinja's new evidence against Dyson patent dispute case rejected by EU's court of appeal

( October 21, 2024, 17:11 GMT | Official Statement) -- MLex Summary: The Court of Appeal of the Unified Patent Court disregarded new evidence submitted by SharkNinja in a patent dispute against Dyson Technology, exercising its discretion under Rule 222 of the Rules of Procedure of the UPC. In this patent litigation between appliance companies, the court found that SharkNinja didn't convincingly demonstrate the relevance of the new evidence, which related to a different patent and proceedings in the US, for the decision in the present case.The document is attached in German. ...

Prepare for tomorrow’s regulatory change, today

MLex identifies risk to business wherever it emerges, with specialist reporters across the globe providing exclusive news and deep-dive analysis on the proposals, probes, enforcement actions and rulings that matter to your organization and clients, now and in the longer term.


Know what others in the room don’t, with features including:

  • Daily newsletters for Antitrust, M&A, Trade, Data Privacy & Security, Technology, AI and more
  • Custom alerts on specific filters including geographies, industries, topics and companies to suit your practice needs
  • Predictive analysis from expert journalists across North America, the UK and Europe, Latin America and Asia-Pacific
  • Curated case files bringing together news, analysis and source documents in a single timeline

Experience MLex today with a 14-day free trial.

Start Free Trial

Already a subscriber? Click here to login

Documents

Related Sections