Comment: Google search antitrust ruling in US was driven by user data, but not user privacy
By Mike Swift ( August 13, 2024, 22:55 GMT | Comment) -- Google's watershed antitrust loss last week before a federal judge in Washington DC was not driven by privacy, despite allegations by the US Department of Justice and a group of states that Google's indifference to privacy concerns was evidence of monopoly. However, US District Judge Amit Mehta's laser-focus on the competitive dominance Google gained from its exclusive access to the mountain of user data obtained through its default search deals makes it likely that his remedy will force Google to at a minimum share the keys to its Fort Knox of user data.In search, data equals dominance — particularly data collected from users....
Prepare for tomorrow’s regulatory change, today
MLex identifies risk to business wherever it emerges, with specialist reporters across the globe providing exclusive news and deep-dive analysis on the proposals, probes, enforcement actions and rulings that matter to your organization and clients, now and in the longer term.
Know what others in the room don’t, with features including:
- Daily newsletters for Antitrust, M&A, Trade, Data Privacy & Security, Technology, AI and more
- Custom alerts on specific filters including geographies, industries, topics and companies to suit your practice needs
- Predictive analysis from expert journalists across North America, the UK and Europe, Latin America and Asia-Pacific
- Curated case files bringing together news, analysis and source documents in a single timeline
Experience MLex today with a 14-day free trial.