This is the new MLex platform. Existing customers should continue to use the existing MLex platform until migrated.
For any queries, please contact Customer Services or your Account Manager. Dismiss

California pay-for-delay law not preempted, law professor argues

( December 10, 2019, 16:24 GMT | Official Statement) -- MLex Summary: California's recently passed pay-for-delay law isn't preempted by federal law, Rutgers law professor Michael Carrier argued in an amicus brief. Carrier sought to file the brief in federal litigation brought by the Association of Accessible Medicines challenging California's pay-for-delay law. The group is seeking a preliminary injunction to block the law from going into effect.See document below....

Prepare for tomorrow’s regulatory change, today

MLex identifies risk to business wherever it emerges, with specialist reporters across the globe providing exclusive news and deep-dive analysis on the proposals, probes, enforcement actions and rulings that matter to your organization and clients, now and in the longer term.


Know what others in the room don’t, with features including:

  • Daily newsletters for Antitrust, M&A, Trade, Data Privacy & Security, Technology, AI and more
  • Custom alerts on specific filters including geographies, industries, topics and companies to suit your practice needs
  • Predictive analysis from expert journalists across North America, the UK and Europe, Latin America and Asia-Pacific
  • Curated case files bringing together news, analysis and source documents in a single timeline

Experience MLex today with a 14-day free trial.

Start Free Trial

Already a subscriber? Click here to login

Documents

Related Sections