This is the new MLex platform. Existing customers should continue to use the existing MLex platform until migrated.
For any queries, please contact Customer Services or your Account Manager. Dismiss

Clorox files reply in support of dismissing Woodman's antitrust claims

( July 10, 2015, 22:31 GMT | Official Statement) -- MLex Summary: Clorox filed a reply in support of its motion to dismiss Woodman’s Food Market’s claims accusing the company of violating the Sherman Act. Clorox argues that Woodman’s fails to allege facts showing that Clorox entered into a horizontal agreement with any of its competitors or that a club store entered into a horizontal agreement with another retailer. Clorox also argues that Woodman's "pleads no facts whatsoever to support its second Sherman Act claim—that Clorox entered into an agreement to cease all direct business with Plaintiff."See document below. ...

Prepare for tomorrow’s regulatory change, today

MLex identifies risk to business wherever it emerges, with specialist reporters across the globe providing exclusive news and deep-dive analysis on the proposals, probes, enforcement actions and rulings that matter to your organization and clients, now and in the longer term.


Know what others in the room don’t, with features including:

  • Daily newsletters for Antitrust, M&A, Trade, Data Privacy & Security, Technology, AI and more
  • Custom alerts on specific filters including geographies, industries, topics and companies to suit your practice needs
  • Predictive analysis from expert journalists across North America, the UK and Europe, Latin America and Asia-Pacific
  • Curated case files bringing together news, analysis and source documents in a single timeline

Experience MLex today with a 14-day free trial.

Start Free Trial

Already a subscriber? Click here to login

Documents

Related Sections