This is the new MLex platform. Existing customers should continue to use the existing MLex platform until migrated.
For any queries, please contact Customer Services or your Account Manager.
Dismiss

US federal judges skeptical of 'hired gun' experts in antitrust cases, judge in Epic-Apple case says

By Michael Acton ( April 6, 2022, 22:35 GMT | Insight) -- US federal judges are more skeptical than juries about expert testimony and they ask themselves whether such academics are “hired guns or independent,” the California judge who ruled that Apple didn’t break federal antitrust law said today. “I find experts to be much more credible when they will work for both sides,” US District Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers told a conference, while adding that she finds it hard to throw out expert testimony from individuals with strong academic qualifications. US federal judges are more skeptical than juries about expert testimony and they ask themselves whether such academics are “hired guns or independent,” the California judge who ruled that Apple didn’t break federal antitrust law said today....

Prepare for tomorrow’s regulatory change, today

MLex identifies risk to business wherever it emerges, with specialist reporters across the globe providing exclusive news and deep-dive analysis on the proposals, probes, enforcement actions and rulings that matter to your organization and clients, now and in the longer term.


Know what others in the room don’t, with features including:

  • Daily newsletters for Antitrust, M&A, Trade, Data Privacy & Security, Technology, AI and more
  • Custom alerts on specific filters including geographies, industries, topics and companies to suit your practice needs
  • Predictive analysis from expert journalists across North America, the UK and Europe, Latin America and Asia-Pacific
  • Curated case files bringing together news, analysis and source documents in a single timeline

Experience MLex today with a 14-day free trial.

Start Free Trial

Already a subscriber? Click here to login