This is the new MLex platform. Existing customers should continue to use the existing MLex platform until migrated.
For any queries, please contact Customer Services or your Account Manager.
Dismiss

Non-compete clauses in Nevada anesthesiology case ‘unreasonable’ even under rule-of-reason standard, US DOJ says

By Khushita Vasant ( February 25, 2022, 23:49 GMT | Insight) -- Non-compete agreements are "unreasonable" and raise "significant concerns," even under a rule-of-reason standard, the US Department of Justice said in a statement-of-interest filed in a Nevada state court as part of a private lawsuit involving employment in the market for anesthesiologists.Non-compete agreements are "unreasonable" and raise "significant concerns," even under a rule-of-reason standard, the US Department of Justice said today in a statement-of-interest filed in a Nevada state court as part of a private lawsuit involving employment in the market for anesthesiologists....

Prepare for tomorrow’s regulatory change, today

MLex identifies risk to business wherever it emerges, with specialist reporters across the globe providing exclusive news and deep-dive analysis on the proposals, probes, enforcement actions and rulings that matter to your organization and clients, now and in the longer term.


Know what others in the room don’t, with features including:

  • Daily newsletters for Antitrust, M&A, Trade, Data Privacy & Security, Technology, AI and more
  • Custom alerts on specific filters including geographies, industries, topics and companies to suit your practice needs
  • Predictive analysis from expert journalists across North America, the UK and Europe, Latin America and Asia-Pacific
  • Curated case files bringing together news, analysis and source documents in a single timeline

Experience MLex today with a 14-day free trial.

Start Free Trial

Already a subscriber? Click here to login

Related Sections