J&J Again Seeks To Block Beasley Allen In NJ Talc Litigation

By George Woolston · June 2, 2025, 4:12 PM EDT

Johnson & Johnson has opposed a New Jersey talc claimant's motion for the pro hac vice admission of two attorneys from The Beasley Allen Law Firm, claiming the partners' conduct in...

To view the full article, register now.

Try a seven day FREE Trial

Already a subscriber? Click here to login

Documents

Case Information

Case Title

Case in other court:

Case Number

3:16-md-02738

Court

New Jersey

Nature of Suit

367 Personal Injury: Health Care/Pharmaceutical Personal Injury Product Liability

Date Filed

October 04, 2016

Recent Articles By George

May 01, 2025
J&J Talc Unit Says New Doc 'Key' To Talc Study Libel Suit
January 30, 2025
Agency In NJ Town Loses Retrial Bid In $26M Land-Taking Fight
January 28, 2025
Creditors Can Join Nostrum Sale Talks, Ch. 11 Judge Rules
January 09, 2025
Judge Nixes Bid To Depose SEC Counsel In $73M Fraud Case
October 10, 2024
Atty For McElroy Deutsch's Ex-CFO Wants Out Of Theft Case
September 04, 2024
Former Michelin Tire Factory Site Worth $30M, NJ Jurors Told
August 20, 2024
Texas Franchisee Accuses Party City Of Monopolizing Market
July 12, 2024
No Injury In Suit Targeting J&J Asset Shuffles, Talc Unit Says
July 02, 2024
Beasley Allen Slams J&J's DQ Bid 'Check-Up' In Talc Tort
July 01, 2024
NJ Judge Tosses J&J Unit's Libel Claim Over Talc Study