This is the new MLex platform. Existing customers should continue to use the existing MLex platform until migrated.
For any queries, please contact Customer Services or your Account Manager. Dismiss

Plaintiff in Gmail privacy litigation says Spokeo decision doesn't nullify standing

( June 1, 2016, 22:55 GMT | Official Statement) -- MLex Summary: In a supplemental brief filed with US District Judge Lucy Koh, plaintiff Daniel Matera argued that his privacy lawsuit over Google's scanning of Gmail messages still meets the hurdle to qualify for Constitutional standing in the wake of the US Supreme Court's ruling in Robins v. Spokeo. The Supreme Court, Matera said, allowed plaintiffs alleging "intangible injuries" to qualify for standing. Under the decision "the Court affirmed the long-standing principle that a concrete injury can be either tangible, such as monetary loss, or intangible, such as a violation of one’s free speech or free exercise rights," Matera said.Please see attached brief....

Prepare for tomorrow’s regulatory change, today

MLex identifies risk to business wherever it emerges, with specialist reporters across the globe providing exclusive news and deep-dive analysis on the proposals, probes, enforcement actions and rulings that matter to your organization and clients, now and in the longer term.


Know what others in the room don’t, with features including:

  • Daily newsletters for Antitrust, M&A, Trade, Data Privacy & Security, Technology, AI and more
  • Custom alerts on specific filters including geographies, industries, topics and companies to suit your practice needs
  • Predictive analysis from expert journalists across North America, the UK and Europe, Latin America and Asia-Pacific
  • Curated case files bringing together news, analysis and source documents in a single timeline

Experience MLex today with a 14-day free trial.

Start Free Trial

Already a subscriber? Click here to login

Documents

Related Sections