This is the new MLex platform. Existing customers should continue to use the existing MLex platform until migrated.
For any queries, please contact Customer Services or your Account Manager. Dismiss

Federal judge rules against Cisco and Arista on motions for summary judgment in copyright and patent dipsute

( August 23, 2016, 22:44 GMT | Official Statement) -- MLex Summary: US District Judge Beth Labson Freedman in San Jose has denied both Cisco's and Arista's partial motions for summary judgment in Cisco's patent and copyright case against Arista. There are too many disputed material facts to resolve on summary judgment Cisco's claims that Arista illegally copied commands for Cisco's networking devices and that Arista's fair use defense isn't viable, she said. There are also too many disputed facts to rule on Arista's partial summary judgment motion alleging that Cisco doesn't have a valid copyright on the commands at issue in the case, and that it did not infringe Cisco's patent, she said. Please see order below: ...

Prepare for tomorrow’s regulatory change, today

MLex identifies risk to business wherever it emerges, with specialist reporters across the globe providing exclusive news and deep-dive analysis on the proposals, probes, enforcement actions and rulings that matter to your organization and clients, now and in the longer term.


Know what others in the room don’t, with features including:

  • Daily newsletters for Antitrust, M&A, Trade, Data Privacy & Security, Technology, AI and more
  • Custom alerts on specific filters including geographies, industries, topics and companies to suit your practice needs
  • Predictive analysis from expert journalists across North America, the UK and Europe, Latin America and Asia-Pacific
  • Curated case files bringing together news, analysis and source documents in a single timeline

Experience MLex today with a 14-day free trial.

Start Free Trial

Already a subscriber? Click here to login

Documents

Related Sections